In Frank O? Hara?s Why I am Not a Painter O? Hara compares the art of painting to the art of poetry. The language in the poem is simple, informal, and downright hip. The poem is free form which adds to the poems unpretentious, casual feel. The reader conjures up images of O? Hara and Goldberg in an artist?s studio standing around talking about art and envision the art scene of the time.
O? Hara was very much into the art scene. He served as an associate curator for a period of time at the Museum of Modern Art in New York and was friends with several abstract expressionist painters, including Jackson Pollock and Franz Kline. He was also a member of the New York school of poets.
O? Hara?s work deals primarily with everyday subject matter which is evident in other works as well, such as ?Lunch Poems?. ?Why I Am Not a Painter? takes the creation of art and puts it into a casual, unpretentious, everyday setting. This casualness is first displayed in (ll 3-6) Well /For instance, Mike Goldberg/
He may also be poking fun at painters. (ll 17-18) But me? One day I am thinking of/ a color: orange. This line starts the most detailed portion of the poem. He spends no time explaining the construction of a painting while he offers much explanation to how he constructs a poem titled ?Oranges.? O? Hara thinks that painting comes more naturally than writing does, but he lacks the talent to produce art work such as Goldberg.
All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009
Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA Webmasters make $$$$