In a chapter titled "Judgment Day", the author starts with a speech on overpopulation, and claims that it was given in front of a college audience in 1970. He asks the audience about the moral situation of killing the 11th man of 11 random peasants, and letting the other 10 go free, or killing 10 of them and letting the 11th man go free. He then asks the college audience for th

The major conclusion that this book seems to come to is that death, suicide, abortion, overpopulation, slavery, and all the other topics most often plagued with moral issues and dilemmas, can be reduced to one or two simple positions. Either they are good or they are bad. Sometime you can state that someone is indifferent to a certain moral issue or topic, but in your mindset, as most theorists maintain, people are still basically good. Most people will make the best moral choice when it comes to questions, if not publicly still personally they will. This is the basic conclusion I got from reading this book and the points it discussed. Although very similar to Hinman's own moral standpoint, it doesn't go as in-depth, most likely to maintain a aura of simplicity so many readers would be able to easily understand the ethical issues and to actively respond to them.

The first chapter in the book is titled "Death", and

Some common words found in the essay are:
Judgment Day, Hinman Johnson's, Peter Singer, , Applied Ethics, book supported, college audience, hinman's own,
Approximate Word count = 622
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)