99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

No-Faul Auto Insurance

In the early 1930's, a group of academics examining the nations auto insurance system suggested an alternative approach, based on the workers' compensation system developed earlier in the century.

Their goal was to achieve rapid and full compensation of auto accident claims without litigation. They suggested that we steer away from the American tradition of resolving disputes through litigation, to a system in which the insured insurance company pays the claim. This proposal won little attention until professors Robert Keeton and Jeffrey O'Connell refined it in 1965. They proposed a limited no-fault system, exclusively for minor accidents. Anyone injured in an accident would receive compensation for medical bills, loss wages, regardless of fault. Only those meeting the threshold of $5000 would have access to the tort system.

At first this no-fault system seemed like an efficient way to receive compensation for accidents, and many states jumped on the bandwagon. At its peak, 24 states adopted some form of no-fault. Currently there are 10 mandatory no-fault


Overall, no-fault does not reduce litigation costs. Litigation over property damage for which the vast majority of car accident claims are filed continuos under no-fault, because no-fault systems typically retain the liability system for property claims. Most claims that are filed are against the Insureds Company, because of failure to pay.

No-fault states have the highest average automobile liability insurance premiums. Of the ten states with the highest premiums in 1989, eight were no-fault. Since then, PA, NJ, and CT have repealed their mandatory systems, however, no-fault remains optional in PA and NJ. From 1989-1995 premiums for no-fault states rose nearly 25% greater than in non no-fault states.

Most of my information came from (Consumerwatchdog.com) the rest from the book.

Under the no-fault system, both the innocent and the guilty are compensated with medical, wage loss and other benefits- regardless of whom is at fault. I would say that paying the claims of both parties in more expensive than paying just for the innocent. The no-fault system does not reward good drive

Some common words found in the essay are:
Insureds Company, PA NJ, Jeffrey O'Connell, Auto Insurance, no-fault system, NJ CT, insurance companies, tort system, increasing premiums, regardless fault, insurance company, system no-fault, pa nj, no-fault systems, bad drivers,
Approximate Word count = 741
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers