their basic rights as living beings. Nowhere is it written that humans, while perhaps the

most developed of all species, are the rulers over their nonspeaking counterparts. Whether

or not a person believes animals have the same rights as humans is not the issue: The issue

is that animals have the same innate right to a life free of pain, suffering and exploitation as

man does, regardless if they are lower on the life chain. Animals have no one to "stick up"

(Harahan PG) for them; mankind must adopt the role of their caretaker or prepare to

"Human beings must consider what impact our actions have on the lives of others.

To limit moral consideration to humans only is no more logical or justifiable than limiting

concern to white people only or to men only; specieism, like racism and sexism, is wrong

because all animals contribute to the ecosystem and are capable of suffering"

The issues that surround animal rights are both broad and complex; not only do

they address the primal mistreatment of those from the animal kingdom, but they also

rights mankind has granted for himself, they are still deserving of the rights to a life free of

has historically been waged in pursuit of attributing human rights to the animal kingdom.

Animal experimentation is a particularly huge component of the animal rights argument,

Some common words found in the essay are:
Rene Descartes, Eating Life, , Harahan PG, animal rights, pain suffering, animal kingdom, intentional pain suffering, free pain suffering, animal rights issues, life free pain, moral certainty, life free, free pain, intentional pain, advantage animal, human nonhuman, animals own,
Approximate Word count = 1298
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)