Imitation Versus Reality
The great philosopher Aristotle once said that "tragedy is the imitation of actions and of life" (521). Another great philosopher, Plato, counter stated that "representation is far removed from reality" (425). Plato disagrees with Aristotle because he believes that the imitation of life is too filled with emotion and not focused on reason. Aristotle argues that emotion is what makes a drama a true tragedy. Both these arguments prove valid points when attempting to analyze Euripides' tragedy Medea. Although the works of Aristotle and Plato are significantly different from each other, their underlying meanings can be combined and compared to Euripides; Medea; when mimesis and diegesis are used to analyze the three works, imitation becomes reality. It is very odd to read both Aristotle's Poetics and Plato's Book X of The Republic. As a member of Plato's Academy, one would think that Aristotle would conform to the ideals and teachings of his educator. It is said that Plato had a profound influence on the life and works of Aristotle. So why then would Aristotle and Plato have different perceptions of reality? The answer is strangely simple. Aristotle believed in the art of mimesis while Plato believed in the theory of diegesis.
How is it that Medea's thoughts and actions are considered acceptable? For example, once Jason's two children fall prey to Medea's murderous hands, Medea is not punished by the gods. She is allowed to escape her home in Athens on a dragon-drawn chariot. This is not understood until the voice of reason, the chorus, states that "Many things the gods achieve beyond out judgment" (465). By the time, one is no longer concerned with the thought of the chorus, but rarely the treachery of the protagonist Medea. Plato argues that when the reader sympathizes with the emotionally driven actions of the protagonist, they have become as inferior as the characters and the craftsman; in this case, the craftsman being Euripides. In this case, Plato would argue that "drama represents human beings in action," (433) and that in experiences joy and sorrow simultaneously, man cannot in unity with himself. He posses the question that if minds are already full of conflict, why then would a writer wish to imitate conflicts of this sort? In the case of Euripides' Medea, the conflict leads to the hamatia, or mistake of the protagonist. This mistake is often referred to, in tragedies, as the tragic flaw. In Medea's case, her tragic flaw was wanting her have everything her way. She became upset with her husband for going to bed with another woman that the only conclusion she saw for the situation was to kill her husband, his children, the other woman, and the other woman's father, which just so happened to be the king of Corinth. Yet another example of how the imitation of life can draw the a
Some common words found in the essay are:
Euripides' Medea, Euripides Diegesis, Corinthian Women, Medea Aristotle, Aristotle Plato, , Aristotle's Poetics, Medea Plato, Academy Aristotle, Euripides Medea, imitation life, aristotle plato, euripides' medea, justify actions medea, aristotle's poetics, aristotle argues, ideal republic, protagonist medea, voice reason, actions medea, medea aristotle,
Approximate Word count = 1063
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|