Exam over the history of Reform and Power of the Elites
American people hear about reform and ideas surrounding reform every election year. Americans around election time begin to hear new policies that an elected candidate would like to enact or reforms that they will pass when in power. These reforms are made to seem like the key to a brighter tomorrow for everyone. Americans begin to live with a new hope, that this one person will get elected and in taking office make dreams come true. In most cases the reforms that the politicians speak of are thrown by the waste side even if they are elected, and when they are enacted they usually fail to satisfy the American people. When one examines reforms that have come about since the 1930's one can see many trends in American desires and how they were are were not met when reforms are set into motion by the government. When speaking of reform in government it is necessary to examine the New Deal set into motion by Roosevelt. Roosevelt enacted a whirlwind of political reform with the hopes of picking America out of unemployment and depression. His aid to the economy, to the jobless, to the farms followed quickly after his election. The New Deal's first act was the Emergency Banking Act established on March 9th 1933, six more were to immedi
To make a final decision on who should run the United States I will make a response that may seem comical but has merit. I would choose to elect a social science professor. The social science professor has a background on how foreign policy or culture so they would make excellent global leaders. The social science professor also has the ability to speak to masses of students on a daily basis; this highlights his or her public speaking potential. The social science professor is also more aware of the needs of a society than the elite because they normally fall in to the middle class segment of the population; they are not out of touch with society. Likewise they are not a member of the poorer community and would have had access to an education. Considering the examples of the Reagan presidency and the grassroots movements it is easy to see that the professor is the choice that is the most logical for representing the nation. Today this can be seen when looking at the Indian population. Though those located in larger communities would have had contact with someone of this race while others in smaller communities might not have had this opportunity. The media since September 11, 2001 has been bombarding households with negative images of this racial minority. Those that have no understanding of this racial group or have grown with only negative images of this group might be more likely to perform hate crimes such as the one that is suggested in The Other Side of the River. The Eisenhower administration with Vice President Nixon seemed to be more representative of the "common man." They began life in relatively middle to lower class conditions and worked their way to the top rung elite by pure will and determination. Though these candidates were representative of first generation elites they both shied away from social or domestic affairs. Though Eisenhower agreed with the Democratic foreign policy he expected the people to take care of their own financial and subsistence needs. Though one would have though that this would be different considering they had an understanding of what it was like to struggle the two felt that ones lot in life was based solely on their own merit and hard work. 3. On the basis of life observation and study in this course I would elect for a government that was not run by either the "elite" who have wealth and education or the working-class citizens whose education might be weaker and knowledge on foreign policy might not be as broad. These are two extreme courses and arguments can be drawn against both of these groups when examining their leadership possibilities for the country Since I have only mentioned Republican candidates in my argument and illustrated a case of educated leadership among a working class Martin Luther King. I do believe that certain special instances exist where an elite man can become a great leader fighting for the rights of the people and I do also feel that Martin Luther King would have been an excellent politician. When forced though to make my decision for the future based on evidence in the past I have to examine two things. First the likelihood of a working class citizen being elected to a political position such a president is little to none. A candidate must be appealing to large corporations and big money in order to get elected because the people in power want to keep a friend in power so that their interests are met. The illustrations of past presidents that I have seen in my lifetime have been predominately republican. Though I read about the prior years leading up to this republican takeover, society today illustrates its desires through the election of this party continually. For this reason, I use the republican candidates as examples. I do not really feel that they are strikingly different from the Democratic Party when elitism is considered. The elite that possess wealth and education fail to see the common mans plight. Many of them especially
Some common words found in the essay are:
George Bush, Benton Harbor, Ronald Reagan, President Nixon, St Joseph, Luther King, Democratic Party, , Rights Act, Conservation Corps, racial tension, social science professor, social science, science professor, benton harbor, grassroots movements, st joseph, foreign policy, martin luther, luther king, access education, martin luther king, civil rights act, welfare policies cut,
Approximate Word count = 2726
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page double spaced)
|