Kant, Hume and Causality
David Hume (1711-1776) was a famous British philosopher who extended the empiricism of formerly philosophers like John Locke and developed a radical skepticism .He argued that every prediction about the unobserved is uncertain. And rejected the possibility of certain knowledge. According to his view all our knowledge is based on our sense expressions. We make inferences (deductions) from these sense expressions, but these inferences are a result of our habit.Although Immanuel Kant (1774-1804) maintained that, after he had read David Hume he woke from his dogmatic slumber and became a critical philosopher, he isn’t of the opinion of Hume about the problem of Causality. He rejects the view that cause and effect relations are cognized through implicit or explicit inference from the past. On the contrary he argues that cognition of causal relations is in some sense a sine qua non of the possibility of experience and therefore the very concept cannot be extracted from perception. Throughout my paper I will try briefly to discuss the cause and effect relation according to views of both philosophers by explaining their thoughts and by comparing them with each other. David Hume maintained that there exits seven different kinds of ph
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
According Hume, Contingency Synthetic, David Hume, Necessity Cause, According Kant, Hume Experience, Hume Causality, John Locke, Hume Kant, cause effect, Immanuel Kant, cause effect relation, effect relation, kant argues, word tree, tree s/he, picture tree, experience events, david hume, objects senses, sense expressions inferences, inferred cause, word tree image, sensory data space, relation cause effect,
Approximate Word count = 1803
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
