99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

Eugenics & The Non-Therapeutic Sterilization of Incapable Ad

Eugenics & The Non-Therapeutic Sterilization of Incapable Adults

Eugenics is the science of improving the population by controlled breeding for desirable inherited characteristics. The horrible effects of Canada's eugenics movement, which spanned from 1885 to 1945, still resound through Canadian courts to this day. The eugenics movement spawned the horrific practices of government-enforced, involuntary sterilization programs such as the Sexual Sterilization Act passed in Alberta. Alberta was one of two provinces (B.C. 1933), to pass such legislation.

The Sexual Sterilization Act, which was introduced in 1928 in Alberta, was based on the principals of eugenics, meaning "good birth". In the 1920's, it was believed that if only those people with desirable genes bore children, the human race as a whole would improve. The Alberta government and pressure groups including the United Farm Women of Alberta sought to limit the reproduction of many kinds of people, including visible minorities and the "feeble-minded". They associated much of the rise of crime, poverty, alcoholism and other vices to these people.

Regardless of the reasons in support of sterilization at the time, restricting an individual's ability to repro


The government, fearful of repeating the Eugenics movement of the 1920s has outlawed non-therapeutic sterilization of in-capable adults not only to protect society's vulnerable members, but also to protect itself from litigations. This no-exceptions stance is aimed to protect society as a whole, but perhaps fails to accommodate the unique circumstances of individual families.

Strangely, Crockett and the doctors gave two totally different reasons why the two parties agreed on castration. The doctors say they decided on this procedure because Crockett's son complained of pain in his testicles. Crockett says the procedure was to address concerns about her son's aggressiveness and violent outbursts. This procedure decreased Crockett's son's sex drive significantly, but Crockett says she had been assured that her son would still be able to become sexually aroused and have sexual relations with a consenting partner.

The horrible acts committed during the eugenics movement still loom heavily, with victims such as Leilani Muir demanding restitution for being sterilized without her consent. In 1955, Ms. Muir at the age of ten, she entered the Michener Centre in Red Deer, Alberta's Provincial Training School for Mental Defectives. A year later, the Alberta's Eugenics Board gave her an IQ test and a short interview. She was declared a "moron" and approved for sterilization. In 1959, Leilani was told that her appendix would have to be removed. While surgeons performed this operation, they also cut her fallopian tubes.

accommodate individual situations. In July 1997, Sandra Crockett provided consent for

Medical conditions under which sterilization can be performed include "mental and physical health," however; the court ruled that sterilization is disallowed for the sake of social benefits (i.e. Being allowed to spend time alone with members of the opposite sex without fear of pregnancy).

Sandra Crockett still awaits her hearing. If found guilty, she could face a fine, the amount will be determined in court. Crockett stands firmly by her decision on his sterilization, saying it was important to the freedom Adam enjoys today.



Some common words found in the essay are:
Sandra Crockett, Court Canada, Supreme Court, Sterilization Act, Gerard LaForest, Leilani Muir, Surgeons Vancouver, Strangely Crockett, Women Alberta, Court BC, non-therapeutic sterilization, sexual sterilization, supreme court, eugenics movement, sterilization act, sexual sterilization act, sandra crockett, alberta government, medical decisions, mentally incompetent, court ruled, non-therapeutic sterilization incapable, rights medical decisions,
Approximate Word count = 1726
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers