This theory tries to solve the problem of objectivity in ethics. It shows that morals are not just based on people's opinions but dictated by a higher being. It also solves the problem of why anyone should obey morals. According to others, if morals were not commanded by god, why bother with them and not just look out for yourself like ethical egoism suggests. According to the divine command theory, because God has commanded it, then if we obey it, we will be rewarded in heaven, or punished in hell.

This theory fails for multiple reasons, the first reason being that it concludes non-sense. The Devine Command Theory argues the following:

"X" is good because God commands it. Therefore "X" was not good or bad before Gods commands, which in result leads to the conclusion that God commands "X" because "X" is good. This means that God could have sai

This proves that god is independent of morals. God simply adopted morals that already existed. So, this would mean that even without God, we would indeed still have morals.

Cultural relativism believes that every society has its own moral codes and that they are rooted and inseparable from their beliefs, experiences and behaviors of a culture. It is the theory that what is considered right in one culture may not be so in another. It argues these five points. 1- Every culture has its own set of moral codes.

Some common words found in the essay are:
Command Theory, Simple Subjectivism, Cultural Relativism, Relativism Cultural, Emotivism Emotivism, command theory, cultural relativism, god commands, moral codes, simple subjectivism, argues god, divine command, divine command theory, theory argues, , command theory argues, mistaken example, emotivism simple subjectivism, homosexuality ok, theory argues god, ethical subjectivism argument,
Approximate Word count = 1079
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)