The Death Penalty was instituted as a way to protect the entire society, which outweighs an individual's power. When someone commits a crime they are executed and they will never be able to kill anyone again. Critics may argue that is cruel and unusual punishment, and that criminals should be incarcerated and rehabilitated. Though this would be ideal, it is not likely because after most criminals serve a sentence and are released they return to society and c

In the United States, a person is considered innocent until proven guilty without reasonable doubt. In most cases the evidence is usually "physical identifiers." In all physical evidence there is room for doubt, but scientific evidence is more unique. At first we only had fingerprints, but flaws have been found in that process which creates doubt. DNA is 99.9% accurate and the odds of it being wrong are impossible. Critics may say that science has been wrong in the past, but DNA is not a "new" process. It has been tested and retested and it is the most accurate technology we have. There have not been any cases that have proved DNA wrong, so it is worth a try.

In a society were we want justice for all it is only right that everyone receives a fair trial. No one should be executed unfairly. Even if only one of the inmate's lives were spared through DNA testing then the suspension would not be in vain. All people who go on to trail have the right to have all means available exhausted before they are fina

Some common words found in the essay are:
United ABA, Death Penalty, Information Institute, Supreme Court, death penalty, Congress Legislatures, Copley Service, Association ABA, death row inmates, death row, row inmates, cruel unusual, dna testing, punishment death, unusual punishment, , cruel unusual punishment, capital punishment,
Approximate Word count = 686
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)