A majority of the children are born with their living parents. By contrast to these children, a girl was born with the sperm extracted from her dead father and implanted into her mother's body. This case has created many ethical issues and many debates, whether it should be allowed or should be forbidden. In my opinion, this practice should be allowed because the child is a memory of the husband to his wife, and because the wife has the right to have the sperm and the child.
First, the child is a memory of the husband to his wife. Because of the husband's death, his wife would feel very sad. The child would be a connection belonging to her and her husband so that she would feel better and have someone to share the sorrow with her. She had just lost the most important person in her life.
A child would bring her a new happiness and would bring her back from the end of the world to the normal life. With the help of modern science, the widow could have a child of her and her dead husband. Nevertheless, people say that there are other ways to forget the sadness. However, the widow may go traveling or remarry, but having a child is a new and a good option for her. It is more natural than the one from a sperm bank. Technology is used to help people, and the child from the sperm of a dead father helps the widow. This modern medical method would bring benefit and happiness to the widow, and it would be useful for people. If it is prohibited, people shall counter to people's own benefit.
Second, the wife has the right to have the sperm and the child. Naturally, the wife would inher
All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009
Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA Webmasters make $$$$