Zimbabwe Imperialism
Ever since the independence of Zimbabwe in 1980, it has become a violent, chaotic, and unstable country. Zimbabwe’s President Mugabe is a tyrannical leader, murdering both black and white farmers while promising a "Commitment to restore the rule of law to the process of land reform." Before Zimbabwe’s independence, however, Britain ruled a pretty-much cooperative land, where violence was only found when the Queen was forced to oppress negative uprisings by radicals that would only hurt their country. The road to Zimbabwe’s independence was long and suffering, but to the British government I pose this question: is the aftermath of gaining independence worth all of that? As a concerned Zimbabwean citizen, I believe not, and I think that it would not only be in Zimbabwe’s best interest to regain the aide of a stable nation, but Britain would gain the natural resource-rich land in southern Africa. This volatile and self-destructive nation needs reform, something that has been falsely promised to the Zimbabweans since Mugabe became president. Although it is argued that the natives’ culture and traditions will be rid of with colonisation, Britain should have no interest in that, only reforming the government and bringing the econ
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Robert Mugabe, President Mugabe, Zimbabweans Mugabe, British Rhodesia, World Bank, Africa Company, Zimbabwe Britain, Front Rhodesias, Prime Minister, Rhodesia Nyasaland, white farmers, · zimbabwe, robert mugabe, zimbabwean economy, britain re-colonise zimbabwe, aids virus, horrific drought, political reform, zimbabwes independence, © 1997, stable nation, political economic social, © 1997 ·, support foreign country, african political parties,
Approximate Word count = 1432
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
