The Language of War.An analysis of how understanding and sup
An analysis of how understanding and support of war is constructed through media texts – specifically newspapers. In 1982 I was not old enough to fully understand what was happening when my country went to war with Argentina over a group of islands called The Falklands. However, I was old enough to understand the comments of my parents when they discussed the situation, as well as the headlines they had read in the papers. One such comment being something I have since heard repeated time and time again from various people; this being on the Sun newspapers headlines throughout the conflict. One of these headlines was ‘GOTCHA’, splashed over the front page when the first major incident happened – the sinking of the Belgrano on May 2nd 1982 (Greenslade, 2002); an event that cost many Argentine lives. In this paper I am going to discuss the ways in which newspapers report on war and terrorism, using language such as the Sun’s example above, and the impact that they are able to achieve on their readers. I am going to argue that newspapers, along with other media, are a tool for constructing both support and understanding of any conflict, thus being a major propaganda machine, without this ever being fully
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Proof Im, Creel Commission, Language War, Saddam Hussein, Gulf War, Daily Star, Luke Skywalker, Philo McLaughlin, Security Council, Walter Lippmann, gulf war, support war, war terrorism, 1995 147, support understanding, philo mclaughlin, saddam hussein, revolution art democracy, government military, jingoistic fanaticism, manufacture consent, aggression reversed quick, rewarded aggression reversed, reversed quick resort, …aggressors rewarded aggression,
Approximate Word count = 2150
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
