My belief is that the Constitution of the United States has offered us many rights, and at times, those rights seem to be in disagreement, while at other times, we would be in chaos without them. The Constitution states all people have the right to life, liberty and freedom. This is a bit idealistic because one person's liberty may infringe upon another person's freedom.
The difficulties in discerning the Framers' intentions increase both as time elapses and as we need to get more specific. Would the Framers have considered a wiretap to be a "search"? Would they have considered flag burning to be a form of "speech"? Would they have considered cable television to be a form of "press"? These inquiries are sometimes made because we view the Framers as wardens having issued commands, the meaning of which depends on their i
Other than this concern, I certainly feel that our Constitution is adequate, and the right to amend was placed in effect in order to offer future generations the ability to make sure that their Constitution works for everyone. Our past leaders have used this right to the best of its ability and have allowed for a great outline for us to govern as well as live by. The Constitution is a beautiful thing in that although we may not all have the same amount of wealth, we have the liberty to.
Yet, who among the Framers of the Constitution ever imagined that the free speech clause might apply to government regulations designed to curtail the export of encryption software? Or that such an issue might embroil the federal courts of America in a high-tech debate over whether encryption software is the expression of an idea or a
All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009
Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA Webmasters make $$$$