Many works of literature provide responses to much debated topics. Opinions are brought forth by means of rhetorical devices and supported by some type of accepted truth. In two such pieces, The Republic by Plato and "A Defense of Poetry” by Shelley, Plato expresses a belief about poetry that Shelley disagrees with and responds to. Through rhetorical devices such as metaphors and symbolism and the use of deductive logic and Socratic writing, Plato provides a strong, very supported argument while Shelley's long sentence structure, analogies and metaphors are weak in comparison.
The way in which Plato uses deductive logic to express his opinion allows him to fully develop his ideas without making assertions that are incredible. Plato begins with the idea of the ultimate "maker of the bed”, which he refers to as G-d which is easily accepted by the majority of an audience. Plato believed that there is only one who "makes the essence of the bed,” (44) the single idea and therefore that is the truth. From there he goes to the carpenter. "There is another (bed) which is the work of the carpenter.” (44) And finally Plato defines his thesis through metaphor. He uses a metaphor that compares the work of a poet to a mirror. "Turning a mirror round and round - you would soon enough make the sun and the heavens, and the earth and yourself, and other animals and plants, and all other things of which we were just speaking, in the mirror...but they would be appearances only.” (44) The way in which the writing is interactive with two people creates contradictions, which challenge Plato's beliefs, yet they are still proven throughout. "Why not? For the duller eye may often see a thing sooner than the keener.
"Very true, but in your presence, even if I had any further notion, I could not muster courage to utter it.” (43) While this Socratic writing helps Plato to make his argument even more concrete, Shelley uses essay form ...
Page 1 of 2