Cultural Relativism
The thesis of meta-ethical cultural relativism is the philosophical viewpoint that there are no absolute moral truths, only truths relative to the cultural context in which they exist. From this it is therefore presumed that what one society considers to be morally right, another society may consider to be morally wrong, therefore, moral right's and wrongs are only relative to a particular society. Thus cultural relativism implies that what is 'good' is what is 'socially approved' in a given culture. Two arguments in favour of cultural relativism are the 'Cultural Differences argument' and the 'Argument from the virtue of tolerance', the following essay will look at and evaluate both of these arguments.The cultural differences argument goes like this; 'Different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no one correct set of moral claims, only those that conform to the major set of beliefs within the given culture'. Firstly I am going to look at James Rachel's (in 'The Elements of Moral Philosophy', Ch.2) analysis of this argument, and secondly I would lie to give my assessment of the argument. Rachel's argues that this argument is not logical, as the conclusion does not follow from the factual premise. The premi
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
World War, Philosophy' Ch2, , cultural relativism, cultural differences, cultural differences argument, differences argument, promotes tolerance, James Rachel's, argument virtue tolerance, argument virtue, moral codes, moral truths, moral beliefs, tolerance cultural, virtue tolerance, conform major set, favour cultural relativism, meta-ethical position promotes,
Approximate Word count = 974
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
