Easy as 1,2,3...
  1. Read a few of our sample essays on your topic
  2. Develop your own ideas
  3. Your paper will practically write itself
     
Essay on Gender Communication in the Workplace

Gender Communication in the Workplace

Communication between males and females has always been somewhat complicated. Because we are arguing that males and females have different cultures we wanted to take a look at what some of these differences might be. According to our research the inherent differences between male and female culture are the different roles that society holds for them and the ways these roles lead to different communication styles. The stereotypes that men and women grow up with affect the types of ways in which they communicate. We first wanted to take a look at how they specifically differ while men and women are arguing or having normal conversations. We also looked at the different types of networks that men and women share. These networks also differ and as do the reasonings for their formation. Although we do not think that men and women need to change their cultures to effectively communicate, we do think that better communication is possible. One of the researchers we took a look at was Deborah Tannen. According to Tannen the reason that men and women do not communicate well is that men and women use language differently. Women take the attitude that conversation is to explore solutions to common problems while men concern themselves more with getting information and hard data from conversation. Tannen states that what women look for in communication is human connection, while men consider status to be most important. They are looking for independence and are constantly looking for higher accomplishments. Intimacy threatens this independence, so men have a tendency to avoid it. One of the old sayings about women is that they talk more than men. It turns out that it is not necessarily true. Women seem to talk more in private conversations than do men. Women do not generally have a fear of intimacy and therefore are much more open with one another during private conversations. It is more difficult for women to use this type of communication style in the public arena. In that case it is men that do most of the talking. Tannen ultimately argues that men use communication as a weapon. They use long explanations to command attention from who it is they are speaking to. They use it to convey information and to ultimately gain agreement. Tannen suggests that through even simple conversation men are continually protecting their status. She suggests the reason that women dominate private conversation is that once men get home they do not feel the need to continue to protect their status so they remain quiet. This causes women to become more vocal. Tannen suggests that status affects many different ways in which men communicate and raises several different examples. One area she found was that men tell more stories and jokes than women. She suggests that they are not doing this to be funny but instead do it to again to negotiate status. They often tell stories in which they are the heroes and act alone to overcome obstacles. While women use storytelling to gain support from her personal networks. They use their stories that, if they are the subject of, contain her doing something foolish to put her at the same level as the listener. In this way women are not concerned with status as with relating and gaining support. Men and women also differ when they are listening. Whi


Names mentioned in this term paper
cooperative overlap, Julie Sloan, Cheris Kramarae, Edwin Ardener, Marriott,

Organizations talked about in this essay
dominant group,

Locations referenced in this report
New York,

Health Conditions referenced in this report
aids,

Keywords talked about in this report
communication, family ties, stereotypes, male and female, Deborah Tannen, glass ceiling, research, Communication Theory, business, Muted Group Theory, typical male, intimacy, conversations, Edwin Ardener, to let, eye contact, educational attainment, free will, social anthropologist, Food Service, New York, society, common, genders, information, Griffin, workplace, The glass ceiling, the speaker, emotional, man made, cooperative, competitive, shone, questions, ploy, group, goal oriented, miscommunication, Bibliography, opportunities, much more, decipher, excuses, two cultures, solutions, sayings, a complete, weapon, hate,

APA     MLA     Chicago
Gender Communication in the Workplace. (1969, December 31). In DirectEssays.com. Retrieved 07:26, June 19, 2013, from http://www.directessays.com/viewpaper/16780.html
All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
© 2002-2013 DirectEssays.com. All Rights Reserved. DMCA