It does not help either when you are also a former England player with a creative spark that brought attention to yourself on and off the field. This was the problem of Glen Hoddle who was the darling of English football during the 80's and his legacy continued and brought the job as England manager. Glen Hoddle started off being conveyed very well in the media with nearly all the tabloid and broadsheets portraying him as the future of English football. He was a clean cut young man with the international footballing world at his feet. Unfortunately after a few unconvincing results, lots of controversy over a faith healer and a poor world cup the media soon started to turn on Glen Hoddle.

When you are in the public eye you have to be very careful about what you do and what you say especially when you have the media's knives out to get you. Glen Hoddle, Unfortunately for him is a man that is not afraid to talk about his own beliefs and he is known to hav

The institution of the media story is very interesting and has a lot to do with the way that the Mirror changed its viewpoint. Hoddle gave an exclusive interview to the Times during the interview the slur on the disabled came out. The Times is owned by Rupert Murdock. Hoddle blamed the Times for taking his words out of contrast. So after the story came out Hoddle moved away from the Murdock papers and gave his story to the Mirror. The mirror had been very similar to the Murdock papers of the Sun and the Times but when they had Hoddle on exclusive that was a change in the way that he was portrayed in the paper. He was given a chance to speak and the comments from the paper were also starting to back him up. After the sacking there was even sympathy for Hoddle and they started to attack the people who sacked him. However the criticism that the FA got was not limited to the mirror most of the media then gave Hoddle a small piece of sympathy and the media turned towards the FA. It seems that once you have knocked one person down the next step is go look for somebody else to attack and that is where the power of the media is shown.

The text started off playing Hoddle as an evil man the media language that was used all went towards backing up this view. We had public view points which were all chosen to back up the view that the public hated Glen Hoddle however there were probably viewpoints giving sympathy to glen Hoddle but they were not published. The text was condemning Hoddle with headlines like, "Sack Hoddle Now". However once Hoddle joined the mirror it became a powerful media battle where Hoddle tried to save his image via the Mirror and fight against the other forms of media that were going against him. The major part of a paper where view points are put across are the comments or in the mirror "Voice of the Mirror" this was where the biggest change came from the voice had originally demand that unfortunately it was a battle that they could not win and Hoddle was sacked. Then however the other forms of media started to follow the mirrors view and gave a bit of sympathy and questioned the people who sacked him. The ironic part is those forms of media that questioned the sacking of Hoddle all at some point played a part in his downfall.

The media language that Glen Hoddle conveys in the paper would be very important to the out come of the story and how public opinion would go. The section of the story I am following goes over five papers from the break of the story to the aftermath of the sacking. We will also see the change in the way the story is reported and why the change came about.

e strong views on God and religion. The story breaks that Hoddle has said that disabled people are being punished for sins in past lives. Once the news of this got out there was no holding back . Every form of media broke the story with follow up reports on the reactions of disabled people, famous peoples view points and the odds on the next England manager. There were calls for Glen Hoddle's resignation and everyone had a view point.

The genre of the Mirror is tabloid. It is aimed at a social class from B - E it is a paper that is meant to give you scandal or create public opinion. The storeys might not all be true but they are there for interest. Stories on celebrities or events that would not make it into a 'Classy' broadsheet might get a four page spread in a tabloid. A tabloid paper will also have a much larger audience then the broadsheets. The main objective of a broadsheet is to inform a tabloid on the other hand is there to entertain.

The representation of Hoddle could of been less biased there was only one side portrayed for a while when the story first broke did anybody think of looking at it from another point of view? It does change but the reasons behind this don't come from renewed faith in Hoddle.

There way that the tabloids build up people and then knock them down is also another factor of a paper like

Some common words found in the essay are:
Glen Hoddle, Hoddle Hoddle, Tony Blair, Voice Mirror, Times Hoddle, Harry Harris, Hoddle Unfortunately, Buddhist Mirror, Honest Hod, FA Government, glen hoddle, hoddle sacked, mirror 1st feb, mirror 1st, people sacked, 1st feb, england manager, story mirror, picture hoddle, murdock papers, public eye, mirror 2nd feb, ideology glen hoddle, media media power, clean cut family,
Approximate Word count = 3168
Approximate Pages = 13 (250 words per page double spaced)