99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

Analysis of Why Terrorists Should Not Have Weapons of Mass Destruction

In 1945, the United States put a final and definitive end to World War II when it used two atomic bombs on Japan, forcing their surrender. At that time the entire world learned of the terrible potential of weapons of mass destruction. Unfortunately, as the major nations have backed away from weapons of mass destruction (WWD), terrorist organizations have sought to acquire them. Worse, technological advances have made it possible for to be constructed on a small enough scale that they could feasibly be smuggled anywhere in the world.

We have seen isolated use of such weapons. Terrorists released the nerve gas Sarin into a Tokyo subway some years ago, anthrax was used in the United States with the Postal Service as the delivery method, and al-Qaeda killed thousands in 2001 by flying fuel-laden passenger planes into buildings (Quillen, 2002). The last event in particular demonstrated that some groups want to leave a large mark from their terrorist activities, making the threat of WWD in their hands a real threat.

One of the greatest concerns of those charged with protecting us from terrorist attacks is that of nuclear and radiological devices. The word "nuclear" immediately puts fear in people because what we know of nuclear weap


ons is the kind of wide-scale obliteration that occurred in Nagasaki and Hiroshima at the end of World War II. However, there are two kinds of nuclear weapons terrorists might use. One threat is more realistic than the other.

The next question of concern to those attempting to prevent terrorist attacks is whether terrorists would use WMD's and RDD's. We already know the answer regarding WMD's. Al-Qaeda used airplanes loaded with passengers as well as fuel in 2001 as WMD's. They also demonstrated that they viewed collateral damage, or death and injury to civilians as well as destruction of non-military targets, differently than most governments do. Al-Qaeda viewed the Twin Towers in New York City as well as those in the buildings at the time as legitimate targets because they were economic targets, and al-Qaeda views American economics as a world problem.

The reality is that terrorist organizations cannot produce plutonium or enriched uranium, both necessary for the construction of nuclear weapons. However, they may have acquired these materials on the black market, and may be able to continue to do so in the future unless the countries in possession of these materials take strong action to keep them secure. Without those basic materials, nuclear weapons cannot be constructed (Bunn, 2005). While the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is a step in the right direction, some countries, because of political changes noted earlier, have somewhat diminished ability to completely control their stocks of nuclear materials. One expert recommends a four-stage approach. First, the number of countries with nuclear materials that could be used to make bombs should be limited. Second, all such materials must be stored in a highly secure way that would make it difficult for them to be traded either openly or on the black market. The homeland security system must ensure that there are no gaps in the methods used to secure the

Some common words found in the essay are:
War II, York City, Non-Proliferation Treaty, Postal Service, Middle East, West Bank, WMD's Al-Qaeda, nuclear weapons, Sarin Tokyo, , terrorist organizations, nuclear materials, Israel Israel's, bunn 2005, black market, laqueur 2004, world war ii, rocket launchers, weapons terrorists, mass destruction, enriched uranium, materials black market, construction nuclear weapons, weapons mass destruction,
Approximate Word count = 1298
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Analysis of Why Terrorists Should Not Have Weapons of Mass Destruction

Weapons of Mass Destruction1677 words
John Newhouse: Analysis of the Bush Administration Response to the ...1856 words
Iran and the Nuclear NonProliferation Treaty under George W. Bush3169 words
Military Intervention in Afgha2777 words
Iraq and High Energy Prices: Economic Development of Importing Oil1766 words

Look at even more essays on Analysis of Why Terrorists Should Not Have Weapons of Mass Destruction
More History Essays

Professional Papers:
The War on Terror1117 words
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION: CASE STUDY In1858 words
Analysis of a Speech: George Bush, March 11, 20021191 words
Violent Extremism in the United States6487 words
US Empire Building3480 words
The US Empire: The Case of Iraq3487 words
Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers