Should India Sign CTBT (Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty)
The article on which this paper is based appeared in “The New York Times” on May 14, 1998 by Paul Warnke that deals with the decision by India to “openly pursue the nuclear option”. In 1996, a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) was brought before the United Nations for the cause of disarmament and prevention of further production of harmful nuclear weapons. India, which had always advocated the cause of disarmament and had the moral high grounds since it called for global disarmament, was expected to endorse and sign the CTBT. With a broad range of objections, India refused. On the surface India appeared to be against the treaty that promotes disarmament. However, India was successful in outlining valid problems on variety of issues. Paul Warnke proudly states that due to CTBT “none of these five declared nuclear powers should or are likely to resume nuclear testing”.[1] But the question is “why should they?” True, CTB
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
True CTBT, United Nations, Ban Treaty, India CTBT, Pakistan India, India Nuclear, Paul Warnke, Asia China, CTBT India, CTBT China, nuclear powers, nuclear weapons, ban treaty, test ban treaty, nuclear weapon, test ban, comprehensive test ban, nuclear arsenals, declared nuclear, cause disarmament, current nuclear, treaty india,
Approximate Word count = 632
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
