the days of testing without much protest are no longer around. According to Tom Reagan, "If we are sure that animals experience both pain and pleasure, then we must regard them as something that counts" (8). Although animal rights activists have some cause for alarm,

animal experimentation is a must and cannot be dismissed. The fact that human beings are still dying due to incurable diseases should be reason enough to still implernent animal testing. David Bender author of Animal Rights: Opposing Viewpoints stipulates: Scientist feel it is essential for the public to understand that had scientific research been restrained in the first decade of the 20th century as antivivisectionists and activist were then and are today urging, many millions of Americans alive and healthy today would never have been born or would have suffered a premature death. Their parents or grandparents would have died from di

via experimentation, none of these cures or vaccines would be available today. The number of diseases plaguing society today are at all time high, thus discontinuing experimentation would be out of the question. Aids (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) has evolved into one of the most lethal diseases ever to afflict mankind, yet no

Michigan and set fire to a animal testing lab . Years of research literally went up in smoke; some of which can never be replaced. This type of behavior is unacceptable no matter how strongly you are against an issue. These beliefs are not shared by the Animal Liberation Front. Scott Plous, a psychologist at Wesleyan University,stated, "The first survey on animal rights activists polled 574 activists. Nearly 80% valued non human life as much as

science can determine water quality standards for Carp and many other species, including humans. Ways are being developed for using the South African clawed frog for testing soil toxicity at Superfund (toxic waste) sites. Because the frogs embryos are transparent,

Contrary to what many believe, humans are not the only ones benefiting from these tests. Both animals and the environment also profit from these methods of testing. The practice of animal testing has been a concern to both scientists and animal rights activists for many years. Although alternatives to animal testing do exist, they are not yet far enough developed to serve as an adequate substitute.

baboons liver, doctors and scientists have learned a tremendous amount about transplant surgery. Nothing is perfect the first time around but in time with help from animals such as the baboon, the procedure can be perfected. The question that must be raised is whether a human has more of a right to live than an animal. In the opinion of many, this question should not even be considered. It is what is called survival of the fittest. Only the strong survive, and in this instance humans are the stronger of the two species. This concept is very common in the wild. Lions kill zebra as means of survival, and tigers eat gazelle to survive. Just as these animals must make sacrifices in order to survive, so does the human race. People need food and cures for diseases to survive, it just ties in that animals are used for both. Leaps and bounds have been made

Some common words found in the essay are:
Wesleyan Universitystated, Opposing Viewpoints, University Pittsburgh, Immunodeficiency Syndrome, South African, Rollin Animals, , Tom Reagan, Lake Michigan, East Lancing, animal testing, animal experimentation, animal rights, liberation front, animal liberation, animal liberation front, rights activists, animal rights activists, alternatives animal testing, scientists animal, concern scientists, scientists animal rights, animals experience, animal research, animal rights activist,
Approximate Word count = 1548
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)