Find your subject
in our database of
Spark your creativity...
an impressive essay!
The freedoms of the Canadian people, as guaranteed in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states in section 1 that ". . . guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits . . . ." This means that specific freedoms, though guaranteed in section two of the Charter as "fundamental freedoms" are subordinate to limitations as the government sees fit, unlike the freedoms of the United States constitutional freedoms, which have no limits put on them, and are occasionally abused by groups such as the Ku Klux Klan, and anti- government militia groups as a result. Pornography, hate propaganda, and racist literature are all examples of areas of expression subject to limitation by the government in Canada, as they are all viewed as obscene. The first laws governing obscenity in Canada were created in 1892. These laws prohibited the sale and display of any material which was deemed immoral. Later, in 1927, the obscenity laws were expanded to include anything referring to "the corruption of public morals." The laws were expanded to make criminal the possession, circulation, distribution or fabrication of any such material. During the 1950's, there was an increase in the availability of pornographic materials. This resulted in two opinions regarding pornography to surface; one opposed to the pornography industry, and demanded more rigid and strict regulations, while the other side of the debate called for no further regulations. During 1958, amendments were put forth in the House of Commons to define the term "obscene" in the Criminal Code of Canada, and were adopted in 1959. Throughout the 1970's, there was an increased outcry by the Canadian public against the growing amount of pornographic material available in Canada. A committee was formed to look at the problem, and in 1978, decided that Canadians were justified in calling for the control of such material. This advice, however, was never acted upon. In 1992, Donald Butler appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada to overturn a decision regarding his adult oriented members only video store. Mr. Butler opened his store in Winnipeg in August of 1987. Later on that same
Quotes talked about in this paper
Names mentioned in this research paper
John Stuart Mill, Mr. Butler, Chris Stone, Justice J. Sopinka, John Doe, Prof. N. Brett,
Organizations talked about in this essay
government, House of Commons, Supreme Court,
Locations referenced in this essay
Canadians, United States, Winnipeg,
Keywords mentioned in this essay
pornographic, pornography, Criminal Code, obscene, hate propaganda, Canada, the criminal code, individual, Ku Klux Klan, John Stuart Mill, government regulation, society, militia groups, individual liberty, public morals, sexual encounter, in society, domestic violence, materials, male and female, Butler, Supreme Court, video store, obscenity, social norm, United States, police force, John Doe, Chris Stone, legal age, reasonable, censorship, common, Winnipeg, Charter, Klux, immoral, anti pornography, demeaning, racist, Canadian, outcry, no limits, assaulted, sexist, impulses, evils, censored, inactions, stereotypes,