by analogy relies upon an inductive inference from the supposition that things

are similar is certain known respects to the likelihood that they are also similar in

some further unknown respect.

Example: "Jennifer enjoys listening to the music of Beethoven,

Mahler, and Bartok. Susan and Harold also like Beethoven, Mahler, and

Bartok. Chris enjoys listening to Beethoven and Mahler. Therefore, Chris

would probably like the music of Bartok, too."

The degree of reliability achieved by such an argument depends upon the

extent and nature of the similarities that hold between the instances in its

premises and the new case in its conclusion.

Also see DPM, Keith J. Holyoak and Paul Thagard, Allison Barnes and

Paul Thagard, and Amelie Frost Benedikt.

The simplest variety of inductive reasoning is argument by analogy, which takes note

of the fact that two or more things are similar in some respects and concludes that they are

inductive argument by providing other evidence of the likelihood of the conclusion.

speak with other people who have recently bought new cars, noting their experiences with

conclusion. Out of eight distinct possible combinations here, only one is ruled out:

standard of correctness for inductive reasoning is much more flexible. An inductive

frequently use such comparisons simply to explain or illustrate what we mean. But

True

Some common words found in the essay are:
Evaluating Analogies, Inductive Inferences, Truth Validity, Analogical Reasoning, True False, Mahler Chris, Analogy Similarity, Kemerling Questions, Prizms Burg, conclusion true, true false, Example Jennifer, premises true, premises conclusion, deductive argument, inductive argument, analogical argument, truth conclusion, valid inference, inductive inference, garth kemerling questions, questions comments suggestions, kemerling questions comments, 1999 garth kemerling, comments suggestions sent,
Approximate Word count = 2238
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)