Adler, the property of beauty seems, unlike the properties of truth and goodness, to be the most subjective property discussed in his book Six Great Ideas. But Adler states, "This is not to say that, in the discussion of the great ideas, there has been more disagreement about beauty than about truth and goodness." (105-106) In other words, he regards beauty as equally, but not more subjective in the eye of the beholder than the moral values of truth and goodness. With regard to beauty as with regard to truth and goodness, the same fundamental issues apply regarding how to evaluate the property and thus all of these properties have objective truths. In other words, beauty is classifiable and definable, and can be broken down into a series of categories. (104) It is not, as asserted in the dictionary definition of the word "beauty" merely in the eye of the beholder. ("Beauty," 2005).

             Adler divides the properties of beauty into distinct components. The first component is that of simply enjoyable beauty, which does not have the symmetry of a mathematics proof, but simply gives on a sense of unselfconscious pleasure to the viewer. (106) It is found in good-looking objects as a visual property and located in the ability of such objects to affect the viewer. It is thus in contrast admirable beauty, which is the beauty of a work of art judged by preset standards of aesthetics. Adler creates these distinctions to suggest that what the reader may consider subjectivity in terms of beauty may actually be different kinds of beauty, one of which he prioritizes over the other. Yet even Adler admits that ". critics, or connoisseurs of painting and sculpture, may differ more frequently or more radically in their opinions about the admirable beauty of a particular work than do the judges at flower, dog, or cat shows." (116) Still, Adler asserts that such a definition of admirable beauty is possible of such works of art because of the agreement to some generalized standards that exist beyond the realm of feeling, even if critics may disagree about those standards.