It offers a place to trade music files for over eighty millions of the users. Is it possible for a person to know over eighty millions of users to justify the use of Napster, sayinggThis is just a personal trading?h? If it is possible, they may not be stealing songs and their excuse does work, but in fact it is not. Trading songs among over eighty millions of the users cannot be regarded as a personal trading because they do not know from who they are borrowing music files and who is lending the music files to them. The scale of Napster is too large to justify the excuse. Also, another reason is present. If the trading songs among over eighty millions of the users were just personal trades, Napster itself could violate the copyrights. The problem is this question,gIs the trade that has an agency regarded as a personal one??h Of course, in this case the agency is Napster, which offers the place to trade the users?f music files. The answer is not because obviously the trading is done with a third party. Without Napster, the users cannot get any songs through the Internet.

             The second problem that Napster has is that it does not pay musicians. Making music and selling it is the way to make a living of the musicians, so if all the music funs did not purchase CD?fs, how the musicians can feed themselves? It is not only the case of the musicians. It is applied for all jobs, shopkeepers, factory workers, and engineers. Paying for those who worked to make something or serve customers is an essential part of the economy, including the workers?f lives and even others?f life. If making something and working did not let workers earn, not only the workers would not be able to make a living, but also the society would be almost dead. The users do not think about the fact. They just complain that CD prices are too expensive and the music companies are cheating the users, then they regard themselves as fighters for the evil music companies not to ruin the future of music and musicians.