Figure 1 shows a diagram of these early .
systems. If something went wrong with this type of system, it was fairly easy to .
troubleshoot, the blame almost always fell on the mainframe system.
Shortly after the introduction of Personal Computers (PC), came Local Area .
Networks (LANS), forever changing the way in which we look at networked systems. .
LANS originally consisted of just PC"s connected into groups of computers, but soon .
after, there came a need to connect those individual LANS together forming what is .
known as a Wide Area Network, or WAN, the result was a complex connection of .
computers joined together using various types of interfaces and protocols. Figure 2 .
shows a modern day WAN. Last year, a survey of Fortune 500 companies showed that .
15% of their total computer budget, 1.6 Million dollars, was spent on network .
management (Rose, 115). Because of this, much attention has focused on two families .
of network management protocols: The Simple Network Management Protocol .
(SNMP), which comes from a de facto standards based background of TCP/IP .
communication, and the Common Management Information Protocol (CMIP), which .
derives from a de jure standards-based background associated with the Open Systems .
Interconnection (OSI) (Fisher, 183). .
.
In this report I will cover advantages and disadvantages of both Common .
Management Information Protocol (CMIP) and Simple Network Management .
Protocol (SNMP)., as well as discuss a new protocol for the future. I will also give .
some good reasons supporting why I believe that SNMP is a protocol that all network .
administrators should use. .
SNMP is a protocol that enables a management station to configure, monitor, and .
receive trap (alarm) messages from network devices. (Feit, 12). It is formally specified .
in a series of related Request for Comment (RFC) documents, listed here.
RFC 1089 - SNMP over Ethernet.
RFC 1140 - IAB Official Protocol Standards.
Continue reading this essay Continue reading
Page 2 of 8