Is our current epidemic of violence the media"s fault? This is the question that has been asked since before television was in every American"s house. Of course there are the different types of media today ranging from newspapers to on-line reports and stories. There have been arguments upon arguments about this issue, and over 3,000 studies conducted. Unfortunately, there isn"t one single result, there is only an array of supposed answers to this undying question. .

             CBS president, Howard Stringer is pointing to a different scapegoat for society"s violence. "I come from a country that puts a lot of American movies on and has more graphic violence within it"s live drama on the BBC than anywhere else, and there is a lot less violence in the United Kingdom than there is here. There are 200 million guns in America, and that has a lot to do with violence." He feels it has to do with gun control, which others have suggested. But there are so many violent acts, that one can"t focus on the guns, just like one can"t focus on the media. David Phillips, one of the men we discuss later put it perfectly, "It"s like watching rain fall on a pond and trying to figure out which drop causes which ripple.".

             There have been many studies conducted on the effects of violence on children, and on the effects on society as a whole. There have been about 3,000 studies performed on this topic. Two of the most prolific studies were the UCLA Television Violence Monitoring Report, and the Mediascope, Inc. test sponsored by the National Cable Television Association. Of course, there were many other studies done, but these made headlines because of their results. .

             The UCLA study focused on all of the television media, and discovered some interesting facts from their study. Prime Time Series raised the least concern. Theatrical films raised more concern and had a lot more violence. The Saturday morning cartoons had mixed reviews.